https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
--- Comment #9 from Bastián Díaz <diazbastian@openmailbox.org> ---
(In reply to Christian Lohmaier from comment #8)
I don't see the need for a linux portable version, as you can always just
extract the rpms using e.g.
for i in *.rpm; do rpm2cpio $i |cpio -idmv; done
and then launh LO from the opt/program/libreoffice dir - if you really want
to leave no traces, you pass another env:UserInstallation parameter or edit
bootstrap.rc in the extracted hierarchy.
so portable version is easy to accomplish - extract, modify the bootstrap.rc
re userprofile and you're done.
Do you think that all users have advanced knowledge of Linux distributions? If
so, this problem would not exist Bug 80941
A user initiates Linux or are migrating from Windows or OS X expects an easy
way to install and update your software. That would help greatly improve the
user experience.
flatpak goes a similar route, by isolating the app agains other stuff, but
is not really what I'd call portable...
I agree with you, but with a little promotion in the future a Flatpak package
can be installed with a few clicks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 97269] Linux portable edition · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.