Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
January 2016 Archives by date, by thread · List index


https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94004

--- Comment #5 from Laurent BP <jumbo4444@yahoo.fr> ---
Created attachment 122134
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=122134&action=edit
Screen shot comparison (Gnumeric, Excel, LibO) for same polynomial equation

Looking at Gnumeric (see attached screen shots with default parameter for
Gnumeric, LibO and Excel with the same polynomial equation), where equation
looks smarter, raise two solutions:
- wrap equation if it is too long (solution c) in comment 4)
- reduce number of significant digits in General format: as equation has no
limited width, LibO displays up to 14 significant digits (whereas Gnumeric
limits to 6 and Excel 5) which seems far too much as a default display.

I would then propose, a mix of solution c) and a):
- if equation has Number format (not General format): display equation up to
chart width, then wrap if necessary
- if equation has General format: decrease number of digits down to 6 till
equation width exceed chart width. If equation width still exceed chart width,
then wrap equation.

This will avoid cutting equation (with ellipsis or red triangle).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.