Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
January 2016 Archives by date, by thread · List index


https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76274

Joel Madero <jmadero.dev@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|bibisectRequest, regression |
                 CC|                            |jmadero.dev@gmail.com

--- Comment #12 from Joel Madero <jmadero.dev@gmail.com> ---
I'm removing the bibisect request here as it's unclear if ux actually wants the
previous behavior (XLT showing up in recent documents) and if so, how that
should behave. Therefore, no need for a bibisectRequest at this time.

Once UX team decides on the behavior, they can decide whether a bibisect would
be useful or not and add the appropriate keywords (also removing regression as
we're not sure it's actually a regression or wanted behavior at this point).

My suggestion is moving forward, no bibisects on ux-advice issues. If UX team
wants one, they can request it after deciding on a course of action and setting
the component to the appropriate component.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.