Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
January 2016 Archives by date, by thread · List index


https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95861

--- Comment #3 from David Tardon <dtardon@redhat.com> ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #2)
@David T., *

Should libreoffice even aspire to be an HTML editor?

It is not an aspiration, rather seeking to restore that capability.

But do we want to restore that capability? Does libreoffice need an internal
HTML editor? (Note I am not talking about HTML import/export.)

The HTML Web component remains implemented--and its "source view" mode was a
pretty convenient WYSIWYG editor for HTML 4 and inline style I believe back
to StarOffice era.

Are you suggesting we strip it all out and concentrate on XLST export only? 

I suggest we strip the whole Web module out. The HTML import/export should
stay. (As C++ code--XSLT is IMHO completely unsuitable for the heavy processing
that is needed to convert ODF to HTML.)


While that is probably valid, I'd like to think there is still a need for
visual HTML 5 markup with inline CSS3 and presenting that markup as WYSIWYG.

I don't disagree with that. What I disagree with is the need to have that HTML
5 WYSIWYG editor inside LibreOffice.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.