Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
December 2015 Archives by date, by thread · List index


https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96679

Joel Madero <jmadero.dev@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|jmadero.dev@gmail.com       |

--- Comment #6 from Joel Madero <jmadero.dev@gmail.com> ---
Fair enough - I pointed to this bug from the other bug report and they can add
what they want.

Anyways, I'm done proposing enhancements for UI/UX - I don't understand the
philosophy. Generally speaking before QA had a VERY low bar for enhancement
requests - basically the principle was:

1) Would it help some users;
2) Would it hurt the project in some way;

We tried to actively engage with users to encourage them to give ideas - to
flush those ideas out, and to explain that many enhancements will never be
implemented (they depend on someone actually caring enough to implement) but
that we're happy to leave them open in case someone does find them interesting
enough to implement.

Now, it appears like UX has some golden key to some secret room with little (if
any) guide as to what is allowed in and what isn't. This proposal met the above
criteria (some users would find it useful, having a few extra keyboard
shortcuts available as an *option* surely wouldn't impact anyone else's work)
yet it was rejected based on "well they could do it another way" or "they
*should* use styles"

Anyways, I'm no fan of this method of a few "insiders" having some arbitrary
way of closing enhancement requests so I'll stop reporting them.

Thanks for taking the time to close this one as WFM.

P.S. The idea wasn't to set more as default - it was to allow users to add them
themselves in the keyboard shortcuts options.

Removing myself from CC - no need to explain anything to me.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.