[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 94760] Better default values for graphics cache

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94760

m.a.riosv <miguelangelrv@libreoffice.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |miguelangelrv@libreoffice.o
                   |                            |rg

--- Comment #6 from m.a.riosv <miguelangelrv@libreoffice.org> ---
Hi, added to this report data that I had commented in
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96095

Test with the file
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/images/0/0f/GS42-GettingStartedLO.odt
reported by @Jay in 96095.

Win10x64

Version: 5.0.4.0.0+
Build ID: 65bdad52a04dc1f5d771bdfdc8bce23e9ba74296
TinderBox: Win-x86@62-merge-TDF, Branch:libreoffice-5-0, Time:
2015-11-26_16:11:50

After clean profile, takes about 01'35" before CPU goes to zero.
With graphics cache: 32 Mb takes about 01'34" before CPU goes to zero.
With graphics cache: 48 Mb takes about 01'14" before CPU goes to zero.

Version: 5.2.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: dc269d07e8e5d71818bc0a546c3daef4d50eb1c7
Threads 4; Ver: Windows 6.19; Render: GL; 
TinderBox: Win-x86@39, Branch:master, Time: 2015-11-27_07:36:59

After clean profile, takes about 03'55" before CPU goes to zero.
With graphics cache: 32 Mb takes about 03'55" before CPU goes to zero.
With graphics cache: 48 Mb takes about 01'00" before CPU goes to zero.

Seeing the big difference on times until the CPU load is reduced, the low. is a
20% less time for 5.0.4, 
The change at least of the default memory size for graphics cache, seem fine,
taking in account that 48 Mb I think is a low value and acceptable for basic
computers.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.