Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
November 2015 Archives by date, by thread · List index


https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95861

--- Comment #2 from V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu> ---
@David T., *

Should libreoffice even aspire to be an HTML editor?

It is not an aspiration, rather seeking to restore that capability.

The HTML Web component remains implemented--and its "source view" mode was a
pretty convenient WYSIWYG editor for HTML 4 and inline style I believe back to
StarOffice era.

Are you suggesting we strip it all out and concentrate on XLST export only? 

While that is probably valid, I'd like to think there is still a need for
visual HTML 5 markup with inline CSS3 and presenting that markup as WYSIWYG.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.