https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90068
--- Comment #6 from Jean-Francois Nifenecker <jean-francois.nifenecker@laposte.net> ---
I completely support Regina's comments: a style name should never convey a
formatting setting name ("bold", "20pt"), but the intend of use for the style.
So, the 'emphasis' and 'strong emphasis' are correctly named, IMO, just like
'quotation' is, etc.
I agree that some names are not immediately clear to newcomers. They just have
to learn. In my young years, I had to learn to read and to write. Then I had to
learn about text processing and styles. Styles are not intuitive, they are
computing matter and this has to be learnt (and tought) as well. I strongly
think the tool can't replace a teacher. Never.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 90068] FORMATTING Proposal to make italic, bold and other font variants as built-in styles, in addition to emphasis and strong emphasis, which are not obvious to inexperienced people and have different actions, particularly in export targets like LaTeX. · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.