https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94760
--- Comment #5 from Zolnai Tamás <zolnaitamas2000@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Michael Stahl from comment #3)
IIRC Tamas was looking at the graphic cache size some time ago?
Is the graphic cache size actually the same as what you set in the
configuration or is there some multiplier applied?
I removed the multiplier last time, so I guess it's the same value. Except that
the old caching mechanism (GraphicCache class) still called in parallel with
the newer caching mechanism (GraphicObject class). So the real memory usage can
be twice of the configured value.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.