https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91441
Adolfo Jayme <fito@libreoffice.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #2 from Adolfo Jayme <fito@libreoffice.org> ---
I don’t see the point of reviving obsolete user interface paradigms. Wizards in
general are clumsy and in-your-face. And I disagree that we need to shove down
users’ throats the perception that we are a software project in need of
contributors (I don’t mean we aren’t in need, but why users, especially
enterprise users, should care about that?)
We’ve removed this wizard on purpose. There was no useful functionality for us
in it —
“Welcome”? That’s obsolete, and a top UX violation according to [1].
“License agreement”? Just no.
“User name”? That’s the *first* page in Options, why duplicate and why
encourage people to provide sensitive details that are easily leaked beyond
users’ control?
“Online update”? That should be invisible to users’ eyes, just like Chrome.
“Registration”? We aren’t a greedy corporation, but a foundation that protects
people’s privacy; so we won’t unnecessarily collect that kind of data.
[1]:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/dn742479(v=vs.85).aspx
Sorry, but I’m seeing too many disadvantages that most likely outweigh any
possible advantage (I can’t think of any, to be honest).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 91441] Implementing a 'Welcome' dialog · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.