https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87538
V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mazelm@gmail.com,
| |owen.genat@gmail.com,
| |vstuart.foote@utsa.edu,
| |wadep_silicore@yahoo.com
--- Comment #4 from V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu> ---
@Jay, *,
I'm not opposed to this. But if the color picker at 12 columns but showing just
10 rows is a problem, it might be a better option to expand number or rows, or
even columns shown.
Q: what would be the best layout of the color picker to accommodate a new
standard.soc pallet?
And, regards the standard.soc pallet, two issues with that:
1.) kind of feel like we are obliged to support our LibreOffice branding,
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Marketing/Branding#Color_Table most of
which are in our standard.soc table now. Reworking as you suggest probably
would require that we move this entire branding color chart into its own
pallet--an addition to your bug 87541 suggestion. Leaving us free to reduce and
adjust the standard.soc;
2.) Wade Peterson's did some very compelling work for a device neutral color
pallet, in bug 80196 -- it could/should occupy the lower rows of the standard
pallet.
@Wade, @Owen opinions please...
Stuart
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.