Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
June 2014 Archives by date, by thread · List index


https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80346

--- Comment #5 from Adolfo Jayme <fito@libreoffice.org> ---
Oh yeah, thanks for reminding me. Well, it would depend on the exact script
you’re talking about; again, the input of native readers of the language in
question is extremely valuable for a decision to be made.

But one must also take into account:
 1) Will the new fonts render well* under Windows (where LO is most used)?
 2) Will the users be happy about a potentially problematic change (e.g., doc.
    reflow because of different font metrics) every time they create a new
    document? Will they expect the change?
 3) Do the new fonts fix any bug (e.g., misdrawn glyphs or broken metrics)?
and so on...

When requesting a font change, a better rationale than “it’s a libre font” is
needed. But that’s just my opinion anyway, the ESC should be better prepared to
decide on changes like this than me.

--
* For example, the Liberation fonts were professionally produced and hinted by
Monotype (supplies fonts for Microsoft). Although FLOSS has pretty much catched
up and there’s a tool called ttfautohint that makes fonts look awesome under
Windows.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.