https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80346
--- Comment #5 from Adolfo Jayme <fito@libreoffice.org> ---
Oh yeah, thanks for reminding me. Well, it would depend on the exact script
you’re talking about; again, the input of native readers of the language in
question is extremely valuable for a decision to be made.
But one must also take into account:
1) Will the new fonts render well* under Windows (where LO is most used)?
2) Will the users be happy about a potentially problematic change (e.g., doc.
reflow because of different font metrics) every time they create a new
document? Will they expect the change?
3) Do the new fonts fix any bug (e.g., misdrawn glyphs or broken metrics)?
and so on...
When requesting a font change, a better rationale than “it’s a libre font” is
needed. But that’s just my opinion anyway, the ESC should be better prepared to
decide on changes like this than me.
--
* For example, the Liberation fonts were professionally produced and hinted by
Monotype (supplies fonts for Microsoft). Although FLOSS has pretty much catched
up and there’s a tool called ttfautohint that makes fonts look awesome under
Windows.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 80346] Preferred default fonts for Asian and CTL documents should be Libre fonts · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.