Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
November 2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Bjoern,

bjoern wrote (22-11-13 16:22)

On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 01:02:03PM +0100, bjoern wrote:

Could you guys form a good consensus on if that should be done in the first

The solution does not have to be perfect, but it needs to be consistly
communicated as a consensus to the developers and have a limited scope. If its
not, someone will have to make an best-intend judgement call like I did with
this change for 4.2. Such things should not be needed -- e.g. this particular
change was lingering on gerrit since September without anyone arguing vicously
on it either way.

Thanks that you poked this list to get response.

It's obvious that the state of the discussion is far from reaching "good concensus" (what is what you asked for) and I do not understand why the control is removed (patch pushed) now, while it's unclear wheter there will be a better solution then the maybe in some cirucumstances "not perfect" present solution.

This really confuses me.


Cor


--
 - Cor Nouws
 - http://nl.libreoffice.org
 - The Document Foundation Membership Committee Member

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.