Hi Regina, all,
On 5 April 2013 11:56, Regina Henschel <rb.henschel@t-online.de> wrote:
I'm not sure, whether a 90 degree rotation is easier. There is no problem to
rotate the image. That can already be easily done with a simple matrix
transformation. But you need to change the area into which the image is
drawn. And that problem exists for a 90 degree rotation as well. You cannot
rotate the image itself and insert a new rotated one, because the image
might be linked and not embedded. Do you know, how that would be solved for
a 90 degree rotation?
So, essentially, you are saying it is easy as long as one is using square images
but not otherwise?
So, no I don't know, but Michael came up with this at the call ... I am
certainly not technical enough to answer that. What works however is rotating
something in Impress/Draw and then copying the image over – so I guess there is
a rotation property somewhere, no..? (Or is that the transformation matrices you
were talking about?)
Astron.
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.