Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
February 2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Recently we had a discussion in design section [1] about standard toolbar.
Question is whether or not functions should get removed or rather promoted.
Since those discussion needs always be based on real user data, Astron was
so kind to make old OO tracking data [2,3] available.

At a first glance it seems to be rather easy to get insights from the data.
The row "Count" holds aggregated dependent value, i.e. how often that
particular function in the context was accessed, and "Widget" the
independent values (in relation to the current question). Grouping should be
done by ".uno:<function>". 

The question to me is which function in "Widget" is related to what real
world action. 

I have the following items:
* AcceleratorExecute (short-cut like Ctrl+C for copy aka .uno:Copy)
* SfxAsyncExec (internally executed when copy/paste is done via mouse, I
guess)
* SfxToolBoxControl (probably as well some kind of internally function call)
* GenericToolbarController
* MenuBarManager
* ToolbarsMenuController

Is MenuBarManager the main and/or some popup menu? What is the difference
between the other toolbar controls?
I add the preliminary, pivoted data ( OOo-Results_Writer.ods
<http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n4036652/OOo-Results_Writer.ods> 
) to illustrate the questions. About 5% of Copy is done by GenericToolbar
but only 8 times Paste with this widget (3 x 10E-6%). 

[1]
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LO-Writer-UI-Analysis-td4032977.html
[2]
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/User_Experience/OpenOffice.org_User_Feedback_Program
[3] http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Tracking_results



--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Analysis-of-OOo-3-1-tracking-data-tp4036652.html
Sent from the UX-Advise mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.