Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
October 2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Cedric, all!

Am Mittwoch, den 28.09.2011, 09:08 +0200 schrieb Cedric Bosdonnat:
On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 23:18 +0200, Christoph Noack wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 27.09.2011, 09:45 +0200 schrieb Cedric Bosdonnat:
On Sat, 2011-09-24 at 15:14 +0200, Christoph Noack wrote:
just checked the recent daily build ... some issues I've noticed when
playing around:
      * the indicator line is wider than the page (on the right side,
        for LTR) ... that looks a bit strange when zooming or working in
        book layout. Could you set the size according the page width?
With some more width computations, I should get the right side of the
page easily.

Thanks!

BTw, while writing that, I just realized that we may want to have the
buttons on the opposite side for RTL text... (header/footers as well).

Yes, makes sense ... I don't know how we handled that for the Notes -
whether the language of the document (may differ) or the language of the
GUI (might differ from the document) was used.


[...]
Phew, I don't have the "oh so great" solution at the moment, but I
played a bit with some ideas:
https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/7HmsuAXxc8BJeGdELeqsUg?feat=directlink

In my personal view, #3 fits best - although stuff like brightness and
details (for the icon) and refinement (like decision on rounded edges)
is missing yet. But, I think that it fits well to the notes and the
header/footer indicators.

I personally like the round edges... but that's a matter of taste.

Haha, I skipped the round edges, because it causes some headaches when
doing some "ideation" in the graphics program. So slightly rounded edges
are fine, I think. (We haven't defined an overall visual style for LibO
yet).

The
control width, icon and arrow position seem more well balanced in your
#3 idea than on my implementation. Could you please give me the widths /
heights / positions you used?

Of course; originally, I've wanted to simply document that. But then
I've noticed that some details are hidden in some mails, and then ...
however, I've decided to start a whiteboard page to not miss anything
important. Although its in an early draft state, please everybody, have
a quick look. The general structure (incl. size) is now available -
including rounded corners :-)

@ all: please check the "team" section (I have been hesitant to assign
any role or duty)

@ Cedric: Please have a look at known issues, I've found some more. We
should decide whether we should write issues, add them to this mail
discussion, or track them via the wiki page.

@ all: Please have a look at "Open Points" - important stuff missing?

Here is the draft page (heavily moved stuff around, so expect mistakes):
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design/Whiteboard/Writer_SpecialIndicators


I also made a quick revert of the page break color change yesterday
evening... but I find the colors used for the header/footer is too
similar while staying quite different: I'm not sure it's really
aesthetic.

Sorry, I'm unsure what you are referring to here - shall the page breaks
have different colors than the header/footer indicators? I find these
related, and we already do have approx. 7 colors (if I remember well)
markup colors.

Cheers,
Christoph


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.