[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice Still?

On 9/30/2014 10:40 AM, Sophie <gautier.sophie@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> Le 30/09/2014 16:12, Tanstaafl a écrit :
>> variation) - ie, 'Stable', 'Testing', 'Development' - is what is ridiculous.

> But those doesn't exist anywhere else, because we are not producing a
> distro but a desktop software and the concept is completely different.
> And yet, this is something that you don't want to ear.

Not at all... it is nothing to do with my not wanting to hear anything.

The end result software is completely different, but the concept is

All you need to do to confirm this is read what you (the proponents of
these silly/ridiculous newly invented terms 'Fresh' and 'Still') say to
*describe* these terms to see this.

Saying otherwise is totally disengenuous.

>> Use STANDARD terms, then precisely define THOSE.

> Which are certainly not stable, testing and development.

Seriously? If you truly believe this, then you have never done any
software development.

>> If you really insist on having two different 'Stable' branches, then
>> name them something like 'Stable-New' and 'Stable-Old' or something else
>> that makes much more sense than 'Still' or 'Fresh.

> Then, do you think that those two stable won't confuse the users?

Some, yes, but *far* *far* less than 'Still' and 'Fresh', nd it will be
much easier to explain the difference.

To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice Still?Hedley Finger <hedley.finger@gmail.com>
[libreoffice-users] LibreOffice Still?NoOp <glgxg@sbcglobal.net>
[libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice Still?arakish <rmfrunyan@gmail.com>
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice Still?"\"J. Van Brimmer\"" <jerry.vb@gmail.com>
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice Still?Florian Reisinger <florei@libreoffice.org>
[libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice Still?alphacrash <v837502@att.net>
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice Still?Cor Nouws <oolst@nouenoff.nl>
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice Still?Tom Davies <tomcecf@gmail.com>
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice Still?Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@libertytrek.org>
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice Still?"Charles-H. Schulz" <charles.schulz@documentfoundation.org>
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice Still?Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@libertytrek.org>
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice Still?Sophie <gautier.sophie@gmail.com>
Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.