[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice Still?
- Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice Still?
- From: arakish <email@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 18:40:51 -0700 (PDT)
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
It is of my opinion that you should stick with the standards.
What is wrong with calling the newest possible stable version "Release
Candidate", the proven stable version "Stable", the unstable beta-tester
It makes absolutely no sense to me to be different just for the sake of
being different. Is not Libre Office already different? Yes, it is a fork
from OpenOffice.org, but you are still different.
Stick with the standards. This "fresh" and "still" horse hoowhee is just
that, a big pile of horse hoowhee.
As NoOp said, most of you open source developers already make the download
page confusing enough without confusing it even further with the horse
Just stick with what almost everyone already knows. Quit trying to be new
and gritty. It just shows me your stupidity instead of your intelligence.
View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-Still-tp4117297p4117877.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
To unsubscribe e-mail to: email@example.com
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
|Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice Still?||"\"J. Van Brimmer\"" <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|[libreoffice-users] LibreOffice Still?||NoOp <email@example.com>|
- Prev by Date: Re: [libreoffice-users] Intermittent Calc Issues
- Next by Date: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice Still?
- Previous by thread: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice Still?
- Next by thread: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice Still?