Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


The problem is that the programmers _never_ test with the extensions,
so, when they make changes, the extensions quit working.  Then the
"maintainer" quits maintaining the extension.  You want a shining
example?  Download, install, and try the SUN Weblog Publisher.


On Sun, 2011-06-19 at 02:18 -0400, planas wrote:

On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 21:40 -0400, webmaster for Kracked Press
Productions wrote:

On 06/18/2011 07:52 PM, planas wrote:
On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 10:39 +0200, lee wrote:

planas<jslozier@gmail.com>  writes:
<snip>
There you go: When you need a particular feature, you must have it. When
you need it, it is totally irrelevant how often you or other users use
it.

How often a feature is used and/or how many users use it doesn´t say
anything about how important the feature is. When someone needs it, it
has to be there.
I would disagree, it takes time to code and debug a feature that is very
rarely used by a small number users. These features may better added as
extension. The problem is where to draw the line and say this one is
included and this one will be a possible extension.

<snip>

I think that the use of Extensions for the functions that are not used 
very often [or rarely], or by few users, is the way to go.  I see some 
old extensions that were created to add functions before they were added 
to the package.

If there is a need for a function for Calc, Draw, Writer, etc., then 
maybe creating an extension is the proper route to go.

There is a movement to make a replacement for Oracle's report builder 
extension.  I do not think anyone would tell you they would want that 
report builder a default, internal, function of LibreOffice.  That type 
of function is useful as an extension.

To be honest, you could make a lot of the seldom used or rare functions 
or options into extensions so the user can pick and choose to add it to 
their LibreOffice install.  Just like all the language dictionaries, if 
you do not need "Lower Sorbian" than you do not need it built into the 
package.  When you do need it, then install the dictionary extension for it.

My thoughts were to allow extensions for very specialized needs that
only a few users need or want.

I sometimes think there should be a method of proposing possible
features and selecting those that will included. How this should be done
I do not have suggestion at the moment.


-- 
Jay Lozier
jslozier@gmail.com



-- 
Roland Hughes, President
Logikal Solutions
(630)-205-1593

http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com
http://www.infiniteexposure.net

No U.S. troops have ever lost their lives defending our ethanol
reserves.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@global.libreoffice.org
In case of problems unsubscribing, write to postmaster@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.