Hi all,Apparently we find ourselves in an interesting situation. With the 3.4.0 release, there are obviously more questions, people stumbling over bugs. - So to help the users, it is useful to point them to the fact that there is a stable 3.3.2 (3.3.3 soon) that they can use with more comfort. - However ... it is both valuable for the project, when the all do some work with the 'early adopter' versions. So, I would propose that the regular helping hands on this list, try to allow for both interests. Apart from the mentioned arguments, it may as well be appealing for quite some people to, to try working with relative new features etc etc.
What do you think, would it be possible and useful (of course depending on the individual mail) to pay attention to both aspects?
That would obviously result in an attitude in which people are not only pushed back from the 3.4.0 to an older version, nor withhold explanation about the choice they have to work with one or another.. Well, each can find his own short or long sentences to explain :-)
some related links: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2011/05/13/announcing-a-new-beta-release/ http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Adapt-o-meter.png http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Release_Criteria Cheers, -- - Cor - http://nl.libreoffice.org -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@global.libreoffice.org In case of problems unsubscribing, write to postmaster@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
