Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 05/25/2011 08:30 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 05/25/2011 03:21 PM, Cor Nouws wrote:
Tom Davies wrote (25-05-11 23:53)
Lol.
Lol too

http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan
Release cycle of 6 months, does mean in our case approximately 6-7
releases a year.
...

No. It means the "final" releases are (I suspect) in sync with Ubuntu
releases:

<quote>
Synchronizing our time based release schedule with the wider Free
Software ecosystem also has huge advantages, by getting our new
features, out to users as quickly as possible - with a minimum of
distribution cycle lag. In consequence, we will aim at six monthly
releases, and over time nudge them to align well with the March /
September norms.
</quote>

Seems to indicate that LO are bending over to Ubuntu/<possibly other
distro>  release schedules. Let's see... Ubuntu releases are April (hence
the LO March time) and October (hence the LO September time)...

This was quite apparent with the LO 3.3.2 "release" in sync with Ubuntu
Natty 11.04 with considerable breakage/bugs still in LO 3.3. Please tell
me that I'm wrong.
well 3.4 is scheduled to be out around June 1st.  We are on RC2 right now.

3.3.0 was LO's first release version and it came out before OOo did and was better, plus a lot of legacy coding was fixed. Every release has some of that old, unused, bad, or clunky coding repaired, replaced, etc., so future edits would not be dependent on the old legacy stuff not messing up the new stuff. Sun and Oracle both had that problem. LO's developers do not have the problem of "wasting" man-hours on fixing code that was not done properly in the first place. Our developers both started cleaning up the legacy coding and put out a better product than Oracle did, plus beat them to the release date. This is not our statements, but tech publication reviews and articles stating this.

As for trying to have our releases timed with repository upgrading? Well it may be something for the scheduling people to use for getting dates. It does take time to get the release packages listed on the LibreOffice download sites to be "converted" for repository updating/upgrading cycles. I do not know how much time it would take, but 3.3.0 came out in the beginning of the year, and then a few months later Ubuntu and others announced that they will add LibreOffice 3.3.x to their repositories and then drop OOo as their default installed office suite.

As for "still having bugs"; well 99% of all software for the PC market has bugs in their release versions. No one can find them all. Some are found by accident due to weird interaction with specific data or actions created by a user. We are no better, and hopefully no worse, than other software developers when it comes to bugs. Of course, we do not charge you to buy our software and do its best to own up to any bugs found, unlike some companies that most of us know and hate. Open Source software may seem to some as having more bugs than their paid alternatives, but the open source community are more open about these things and will not tell you that you are at fault and not their high priced software. This openness also makes it easier to find the cause of the bug and get it fixed faster and better.

As for fixed schedules for software releases????
If the developers have version 3.4.4 list of work finished a month early, they could start the RC process early, and not wait. So people could see a new version/update out quicker than schedules, or if problems arise even have it out later. 3.4 was originally due out mid May, but it will be late May or first thing in June. No big deal. Of course we are not waiting for the Fall to introduce the 3.4 version and keeping the 3.3.x numbers going and going till then.

That is my opinion - what is yours?



--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.