Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


But OO 3.4 doesn't have the features of LO 3.3.

I think that the numbering system needs to be 'broken' so that the two
projects can't be confused.

Wayne



On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Alexander Thurgood <alex.thurgood@gmail.com
wrote:

Le 17/04/11 10:44, plino a écrit :

OOo released 3.4 Beta on April 11 and LO jumped on their tail (apparently
with extremely bad results on ALL platforms...)

Yep, at least OOo 3.4-dev (at it is called) appears to work on my Mac,
which certainly can not be said of LO3.4beta :-/

Alex


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted



-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.