Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi :)

I found Ubuntu Brainstorm very dis-satisfying.  The main problem with it (imo) 
is that the first few pages are all old ideas that have received a lot of 
votes.  


If the first page had the most easily viable ideas along with the most 
innovative and interesting ideas then it would work a lot better.  The problem 
is how could that be automated??

Also the Ubuntu Brainstorming requires a moderator to decide whether or not any 
new idea makes it to the list at all.  I feel that contravenes the OpenSource 
philosophy.  Although it makes "common sense" that all things should be 
moderated we keep repeatedly finding that being more Open works better because 
people almost always start to take responsibility even if they start out in a 
way that embarrasses themselves later.  


I have not tried GetSatisfaction or Blueprint so i can't comment.  Bugzilla 
seems fine even tho it looks a little dated nowadays it does the job very well 
imo.
Regards from
Tom :)




________________________________
From: Craig B. Olofson <c.olofson@gmail.com>
To: users@libreoffice.org; marketing@libreoffice.org
Sent: Mon, 20 December, 2010 21:07:00
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Idea about Ideas

OK;

After reading the brainstorm document, a couple of observations:

1) Ubuntu Brainstorm:  Please consider the differences in layout between 
Ubuntu's Brainstorm and Getsatisfaction's Ideas page for Mozilla Messaging.  I 
don't know about everyone else, but I find Getsatisfaction's UI much easier to 
digest on any regular basis.  As a result, the UX is more pleasant and I end up 
participating there more regularly.

http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/
http://getsatisfaction.com/mozilla_messaging/ideas/popular

2) Launchpad Blueprint:  Of the two projects on Launchpad that I've referenced, 
one doesn't use blueprint, the other uses it for tracking bugs (or feature sets 
listed as bugs).   In other words, I'm not sure what the value proposition is in 
using Blueprint.  I do use Bugzilla, however, to track issues which are 
important for us and I find it very easy to do so.

https://help.launchpad.net/Blueprint
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/index.cgi

Thank you very much to the entire LibreOffice community for your time and 
efforts.  Best wishes to you & yours over the Holidays.

-Craig

On 12/20/2010 11:31 AM, Marc Paré wrote:
Le 2010-12-20 10:44, Katheryne Draven a écrit :
Craig excellent breakdown, Spot on thinking.


FYI, this was answered on the marketing list by Michael Wheatland, our Drupal 
LibreOffice website lead developer:

=======================

Pawel,
I am happy to say that the website team is currently in the process of
working on this. We are creating a system which will be borrowing the
best ideas from a range of suggestion systems and idea trackers such
as Ubuntu Brainstorm, Google Moderate and Launchpad Blueprints.
Integration with LibreOffice would be difficult, but it may be
something we could consider in the future.

I have cross posted this in the website mailing list, as at the moment
it is a question of infrastructure rather than marketing.
If you wish to keep track of the progress of the concept and possibly
even contribute to the construction of such a system please feel free
to contact Ben or Narayan on the website mailing list or visit our
wiki page on the development:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Website/Drupal/brainstorm

Thanks,
Michael Wheatland

=======================

Feel free to participate if interested.

Marc Paré
Drupal Web. Dev. Team Member



-- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/users/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***



      
-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/users/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.