Re: [libreoffice-users] Multiple references to footnote?

Brian Barker <b.m.barker -AT- btinternet.com>
Wed, 02 Jun 2021 21:02:41 +0100

At 13:42 02/06/2021 -0600, Joe Conner wrote:

This seems to me to be a use of ibid.


Maybe.

"Ibid." is short for "ibidem", which is Latin for "in the same place"- or "there again". So that works perfectly well if the footnote is acitation, but not if it is some elaboration or explanation of thefootnoted text. It doesn't mean "ditto".

Brian Barker


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy

Context

[libreoffice-users] Multiple references to footnote? · Gary Collins
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Multiple references to footnote? · Robert Großkopf
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Multiple references to footnote? · Regina Henschel
  - Re: [libreoffice-users] Multiple references to footnote? · Joe Conner
    - Re: [libreoffice-users] Multiple references to footnote? · Brian Barker

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.