Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2019 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 10.08.2019 23:23, Brian Barker
      wrote:
At
      10:03 10/08/2019 +0100, Dave Barton wrote:On 10.08.2019 09:33, Brian Barker wrote:At 08:58 
10/08/2019 +0100, Dave Barton
          wrote:Does anyone know why fields with
            spelling errors are not checked by the spell checker in
            Writer? For example change the "User Name" to something
            blatantly incorrect and insert the "Author" field into a
            document. Do the same with a "Document Title".Some combination of (1) proper names - 
even document titles -
          are frequently not dictionary words and (2) users are likely
          to have taken particular care over entering the data for such
          fields and not need the assistance of a spelling checker?What you say would be true in a 
perfect world, but in reality
        users (even careful ones) DO make mistakes.I didn't suggest otherwise. See my word 
"likely".Are you saying that our developers are
        making a highly arrogant presumption that mistakes are NEVER
        made in user defined fields?No, of course not. I've reread my answer and I don't see that
      anywhere in it. If I'd meant that, I'd have said it. That's a
      straw man.In the same way, most mail clients don't
          check the spelling of the To: header of a message, even the
          "real name" part. And many - even one well-known one - do not
          check the Subject: header. The spelling checker I use with my
          mail client accepts "Dave" but won't countenance "Barton".Email headers are an entirely 
different beast and have nothing
        to do with Writer fields.I thought (and still think) that - for most readers - this
      comparison may shed light on the idea. The whole question is a
      matter of balance: any checking is bound to throw up some false
      positives, and it is a question of judgement when the frequency of
      false positives outweighs the usefulness of the checking process.
      I'm quite happy with your making a different judgement from me or
      the program's designers. Clearly I cannot help you. I hope one or
      more of the other thousands on this list will.Brian BarkerĀ As usual Brian you and I will have 
to agree to disagree and my
    original question still goes unanswered as to why inserted fields
    are not spell checked..It would be fantastic if there were thousands of subscribers to this
    list, but it is more likely they only only number in hundreds.Dave
-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.