rather than responding to the fact that one query had been waiting
for a couple days before being added to the list,
this conversation has become inanely silly.
The way I handle e-mails is to eliminate all the wasteful space,
including all the computer gibberish, which otherwise makes the e-mail next
to impossible to read after a while as the margins become ever wider & the
text ever narrower.
And since I was the first to respond to that e-mail, there was no
'thread' to follow - other than to show it came from a non-list member.
From: James E Lang <jelly@lang.hm>
Date: Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 9:02 PM
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] in response ...
To: anne-ology <laginnis@gmail.com>
The tool you use to send email replies does not create References or
In-Reply-To headers. That is what breaks threads. The best email tools use
those headers to create a hierarchical view of a thread.
--
Jim
From: anne-ology <laginnis@gmail.com>
To: Brian <b.m.barker@btinternet.com>
Cc: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 11:14
Subject: [libreoffice-users] in response ...
... this message was waiting for 2 days to be released to the list;
when I opened it to see if it was junk or not, I was
surprised to see that someone had posted a query.
Since I thought I might be able to help, I responded to it.
I responded to the original message, merely deleting the non-list
data,
so I really do not understand what thread was broken.
with all sincerity, & confused by your attitude,
From: Brian Barker <b.m.barker@btinternet.com>
Date: Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:13 AM
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Access to Libre Office files
To: Anne Noname <laginnis@gmail.com>
Cc: "Charles-H. Schulz" <charles.schulz@documentfoundation.org>
At 09:43 30/01/2017 -0600, Anne Noname wrote:
From: Gareth Walters <garethwalters@myphone.coop>
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 12:11:05 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Lacl of Access to Libre Office files
Good morning. ...
maybe I can help - ...
You are doing it again!
Please, when you are asked to moderate an incoming message, your choices
are to permit it to be posted or not. Whichever you choose, you may, of
course, wish to reply yourself. But if you reply to a message that you
allow to go to the list, you need to reply to the copy that you will then
get from the list, not the original secret copy you received. Doing it the
wrong way wrecks the threading and confuses people. You owe it to them to
get it right.
Would you release the original message, please?
Brian Barker - privately
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- Re: [libreoffice-users] in response ... · anne-ology
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.