Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2016 Archives by date, by thread · List index

This has always puzzled me :-

Why does LO list bugs by 'earliest version affected' ?
If you look at the bug list for 5.1 for example, it shows
119 bugs.  There are a number of bugs that 5.1 has 
that don't show on the list as they are recorded as affecting
earlier versions. Why would anyone working on 5.1 look
for a bug that is down as affecting 4.1 or something.
An issue that came up the other day in both 5.0.4 and 5.1RC2
is actually first recorded as affecting 4.4.0 which by their
roadmap went end of life in the middle of last year. 


To unsubscribe e-mail to:
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.