On 19/08/15 12:07, James Knott wrote:
On 08/18/2015 04:24 PM, zed wrote:
James Knott <email@example.com> wrote:
I just came across this article.
The review seems to be of LibreOfice v4.0. So, a little out of date :-)
Someone else, possibly from Australia also saw 4.0, whereas I see 5.0.
I guess that's what happens when you're upside down. ;-)
Well, it looks like a 4.0 review to me. Firefox gives page info as
published time: 2013-05-01T16:57:00+00:00
and the page says "Version 4.0, recently released, looks a lot like the
long-running 3.x series, but ...."
I'm definitely in the northern hemisphere, unless continental drift has
I wish these guys would date their reviews!
Harlow, Essex, England
To unsubscribe e-mail to: firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice 5.0 Review & Rating | PCMag.com · zed
- [libreoffice-users] Re: Is anybody else having problems with Windows 10 / LO 5.0 (continued)
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy