Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice 5.0 Review & Rating | PCMag.com

On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 12:15 +0100, Mike Scott wrote:
> Well, it looks like a 4.0 review to me. Firefox gives page info as
> published time: 2013-05-01T16:57:00+00:00

I get a LO 5.0 review... but it is OK, you aren't missing anything.  It
is a pretty typical drive-by rubbish review which spends most of its
time nit-picking superficial issues.   Mostly it reads like an add for
pay-for products [he even includes links and prices].

"Among the new features in LibreOffice 5.0 are some that you probably
won't care about,"  ... yeah, classy.  I love reviewers who know what
features I need and what is important to me.

And he clearly does not know how to do versioning in LO.  So he
criticizes it as wanting.

I should get a job writing these kinds of reviews - EASY MONEY!

I miss the depth of old BYTE! magazine reviews.

-- 
Adam Tauno Williams <mailto:awilliam@whitemice.org> GPG D95ED383
Systems Administrator, Python Developer, LPI / NCLA



-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted