Hi :) My work-place is determined to use Microsoft even in cases where a competing product is significantly better at the main task a program is beign used for. For example Outlook (not the 365 one) for calendars and room bookings rather than something that can be read outside the office. The only time they are interested is after a better system has been set-up and they can see it running - ie a bit too late to charge them for the work of setting it up! My managers and some colleagues still deny that they have problems due to incompatibility (despite buying the same products that are being used by other organisations) - and then make a big fuss about "having to Pdf it" and about how Pdfs (from MSO) are almost invariably being blurry (unlike ones done in LO) Regards from Tom :) On 2 June 2015 at 15:18, message <letter@openmailbox.org> wrote:
Readers, UK government proceeds with strategic support of open standards. However, at local and departmental level, proprietary format continue use due to managerial inertia. It's up to taxpayers... https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/open-formats-implementation-plan/open-formats-implementation-plan https://diasp.eu/posts/3185007 https://diasp.eu/posts/3183106 https://diasp.eu/posts/3181869 https://diasp.eu/posts/3181361 -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
-- To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted