Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2014 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Thursday 22 May 2014 11:32:03 AM Hedley Finger wrote:
Bruce:Explain to the folks how FrameMaker's management of anchored
        graphics does it better, and could be well emulated by the OOo
        varieties. In fact, FM's xref formats, index entry formats, ToC,
        LoF, LoT formats and much more should be implemented in
OOo's.Regards,Hedley

Hedley:

Cross-references are improved by using autotext to create some building 
blocks, although they're still not as good as in FrameMaker.

ToCs and the like are clumsy but tolerable when you get to know them, although 
organized differently from FrameMaker's.

But the anchored graphics -- there, I miss FrameMaker something fierce. I don't 
know what's so hard about the concept that an anchor is supposed to keep a 
graphic where you put it.

-- 
Bruce Byfield 604-421-7189 (on Pacific time)
blog: https://brucebyfield.wordpress.com
website: http://members.axion.net/~bbyfield/

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.