I do NOT appreciate being mis-quoted;
I was responding to that Urmas who made the inane MSFT comments.
If you were to read the whole bit, ... ... ...
but I guess that goes against common sense :-(
Out of the 2 sentences below, the first is part of my initial
response to the initial questioner;
the second is part of the response by that Urmas.
From: pete nikolic <email@example.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:03 PM
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: CONVERTING A MICROSOFT TEMPLATE TO BE
USED WITH LIBRE OFFICE
On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 01:06:14 +0700
"Urmas" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
MSFT has been/is making their system(s) incompatible with others in
order to reap a higher profit-margin ;-(
For the last 23 years Microsoft Office has changed its format TWICE.
Meanwhile, Libreoffice cannot open its own documents from 2001.
Darn M$ Corp shill talking trash as per usual .
To unsubscribe e-mail to: email@example.com
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: CONVERTING A MICROSOFT TEMPLATE TO BE USED WITH LIBRE OFFICE · anne-ology
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy