2014/1/13 frank ernest <doark@mail.com>
Acctually I thought that it was kinda obvious and I was thinking that
you'd want to fix it before your ODT standard was widly adopted.
It would be easier to change the code of 10 programs then 1000 once you
finally retire the standard.
You could also develop a split in the standard and call the files *.ODT2.
Personally I was shocked how bad the compression was. I expected maybe I'd
get 5% or (if I was really lucky) 15% better compression, but 25%! That's
(as someone already pointed out) HUGE!
I am advising to fix the spec before the cat gets out of the bag.
Huu, you might have missed the last five years where odt is already widely
used.
Also, you should warn microsoft before their docx stuff get in the wild
too, as they also use the zip file format.
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.