In data lunedì 25 novembre 2013 09:01:43, M Henri Day ha scritto:
2013/11/24 Urmas <email@example.com>
The article itself clearly states that the project was easily within
budget. Plus the organisation didn't have to upgrade any hardware.
See paragraphs 6 & 7 under the heading "Cost".
The report is missing the salaries. Also, there is no way the machine with
Windows NT could run Ubuntu 10.10, which is the ultimate Limux base. They
have to upgrade the old hardware out in order to do that.
«[N]o way in which the machine [sic !] with Windows NT could run Ubuntu
10.10 ...» One of the more absurd comments I've yet seen, as anyone here
can verify by checking the Ubuntu system requirements, available here :
Signature «Umas» is about as credible here as when s/he made statements
about Chinese glyphs....
YADTCFU !!! (Yet Another Debunking Tentative Comment From Urmas!!!) :D
Open Source is better!
To unsubscribe e-mail to: firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy