The next thing people will insist on is LO being designed to run on all
2, 4, 6, or even 8 cores of the CPU at the same time to make it even
Do you really think it makes sense that Calc and Base are not prepared to
use all the computing power available?
Why do you think TDF and AMD are trying to bring GPU calculation to LO?
Because Calc (I haven't even tried Base...) is absurdly slow!
A heavy calculation spreadsheet I have takes 50 "seconds" to open in Excel
2010 and takes more than 10 *minutes* to open in Calc! (both 32bit versions)
No wonder Kohei Yoshida (one of, if not *the* main Calc developer) said
recently (August 2013): " You can’t compare Calc with Excel yet. They are
still miles ahead of us."
When Calc is able to use all cores and threads and eventually 64bit
operations then it might be on par...
Why do you assume the OP isn't doing number crunching?
View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/64-bit-tp4081444p4081605.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
To unsubscribe e-mail to: firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy