Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index


An odt document was converted to the fodt format using the menu bar
'save as' option.

Why is the option fodt listed nearest to the bottom, after m$ (?!),
starwriter, text, html, aportisdoc ??? Native odf must be treated with
greater respect and higher priority! LO is not an m$ clone! (end of

After closure of the odt document (which was opened via the command
line, hence the ability to see the warning), the terminal reported the
following warning:

Warning: at xsl:stylesheet on line 2 of
  Running an XSLT 1.0 stylesheet with an XSLT 2.0 processor

The equivalent fodt document was then opened in the command terminal,
which reported the following (whilst the document remained open):

Warning: at xsl:stylesheet on line 2 of
  Running an XSLT 1.0 stylesheet with an XSLT 2.0 processor

How significant is this warning?

The stylesheet is as follows:

<?xml version='1.0' encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="";>
    <xsl:output method="xml" encoding="UTF-8" indent="yes"/>

    <xsl:template match="@*|node()">
            <xsl:apply-templates select="@*|node()"/>

As root, the stylesheet was amended to change the version to '2.0' and
the fodt re-opened without the warning error.

Is this manual change likely to cause a problem with the intended use
of the fodt file, subversion document control?

To unsubscribe e-mail to:
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.