When I was learning such things back in the 1960s and 70s, a single
space between sentences would have been marked as wrong. Things do have
a way of constantly changing (evolving or deteriorating, depending on
your opinion), but I still stick to the two-space standard after the
sentence. I think that makes things more readable, and I believe
readability should be the paramount goal.
-- Tim Deaton
On 8/15/2013 2:30 PM, Andrew Brown wrote:
Umm!! No Dave, that's what thousands of years of language and millions
of literary academics and scholars, since time of man to present
decided on in language standards, especially as we are referring to
here, the English language.
Nothing to do with just HTML, a computer born programming language and
not a literary language. The single space IS universally accepted as
the norm for correct spacing in whatever medium we are writing /
typing / printing in. It's what individuals do and teach incorrectly,
but unchallenged on the whole, in adding double spaces between
sentences. What one does and what is a standard is two different things.
Regards
Andrew Brown
On 15/08/2013 08:04 PM, Dave Liesse wrote:
Well, that's what someone decided, and it is the standard for HTML,
but it still is not universally accepted. A double space, whatever
minimal width the space is, makes it clear that a sentence has
ended. There is an obvious difference from a single space following
an abbreviation, for example. I don't expect a word processor to
eliminate extra spaces (and I long ago disabled that "correction").
Dave
On 8/14/2013 20:38, Brian Barker wrote:
At 21:23 14/08/2013 -0500, Michael Morse wrote:
For some reason, I am no longer able to make a series of spaces
using the space bar. After one space, pressing the space bar will
not advance the cursor.
Rejoice! This is how all word processors should work. Countable
spaces exist only in Typewriterland. With proper type faces, the
space between words is anything from a minimum value up to whatever
is required to range across a line. The spacebar no longer
represents an actual amount of space but merely indicates a word
break in the text. If you need to space material differently, you
do it properly - using tabs, tables, frames, or whatever.
I don't remember changing anything so I have no idea where to even
begin to look for whatever setting I assume I must have changed to
cause this behavior. Can someone help me how please?
Yes: forget about multiple spaces and set up proper spacing using
the correct facilities of your word processor, whichever that is.
(Oh, but if you really want to fossilize in Typewriterland in the
previous millennium, go to Tools | AutoCorrect Options... | Options
and remove the tick from "Ignore double spaces". And hang your head
in shame.)
;^)
I trust this helps.
Brian Barker
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- [libreoffice-users] Re: Can't find setting (continued)
Re: [libreoffice-users] Can't find setting · Dave Liesse
Re: [libreoffice-users] Can't find setting · Tom Davies
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.