Ah, well, that explains why the manual(s) make no sense ;-)
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Tom Davies <email@example.com> wrote:
Ahh, i didn't think they mentioned specific Extensions and their usage. I
thought they only covered the core functionality.
*From:* anne-ology <firstname.lastname@example.org>
*To:* Tom Davies <email@example.com>
*Cc:* "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>
*Sent:* Monday, 10 June 2013, 23:55
*Subject:* Re: [libreoffice-users] CNET is claiming the best free MSO
alternative is not LO
I've tried a couple of times - whenever I've wanted to figure out
what add-on was included vs. what wasn't ...
it was like reading in circles ... such 'n such is for such 'n
such but not needed if ... ... ...
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Tom Davies <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Has anyone read the Published Guides for LibreOffice? or used them to
look up the odd thing or few? They are kinda ok aren't they?
To unsubscribe e-mail to: email@example.com
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
- Re: [libreoffice-users] CNET is claiming the best free MSO alternative is not LO · anne-ology
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy