Hi :)
I think Win7 uses less resources than Vista. it was the first time they de-bloated their OS = an
attempt to fit it onto mobile devices such as tablets (ok, not very mobile but more mobile than
desktops). So upgrading from Vista to Win7 might well be a good idea without worrying about
upgrading Ram.
"Just play a few games"! It's games that typically push the limits of computers and push people
into upgrading hardware.
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Fri, 10/8/12, webmaster-Kracked_P_P <webmaster@krackedpress.com> wrote:
From: webmaster-Kracked_P_P <webmaster@krackedpress.com>
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] why does Windows version take so long to remove?
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Friday, 10 August, 2012, 14:07
On 08/10/2012 05:53 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2012-08-08 4:19 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P <webmaster@krackedpress.com> wrote:
I will say though... I consider 1GB to be the *bare minumum* on an XP
box but it will still be sluggish. I couldn't use it with 512MB, it
would drive me to drink.
For XP, I always recommend 2GB, and for 7 (won't touch Vista), minimum
is 4GB.
The system came with 512 from the factory. All the systems I dealt with
that had XP from the factory has 512 for ram.
Irrelevant to my point. The fact is, XP is simply a total DOG with less than 1GB RAM, and is much
better with 2GB.
I do not have Win7, but would like to replace my Vista laptop with
it.
Just be sure to get 64bit with at *least* 4GB, but much better would be 8G.
Sorry, but my Vista laptop maxed out at 3 GB, so I will need to install Win7 with 3 GB. It was not
made for Win7 but almost anything is better than Vista. I doubt that I will be able to get it to
have more memory than the 3 GB installed, but I will look into it.
I want to get that system upgraded in the near future so I can deal with the Win7 people and their
LO needs. It is getting to be a problem not having a Win7 system for supporting people. I prefer
Ubuntu, but most of my friends use Win7 now. Only one uses Linux.
I really want to keep supporting LO under Windows, so as people buy new systems with Win7, I am
loosing ground with them. One girl bought a very powerful 17" laptop, just to type notes, play
videos, and browse the Net. She spent three times as much as needed for doing just that type of
"work". I would love such a laptop, but I cannot afford one like that. At least she is using LO
now and not get convinced that she had to have MSO.
-- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- Re: [libreoffice-users] why does Windows version take so long to remove? (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.