On 09/10/2011 11:30 AM, David B Teague sr wrote:
On 9/10/2011 12:53 AM, planas wrote:
David
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 23:32 -0400, David B Teague sr wrote:
I run W7 64 bit, 4 gig RAM.
jre-6u19-windows-i586-s.exe
I have three questions: Do I want to install LO 3.4.3 or LO 3.3.4?
<SNIP>
Many thanks for your useful and informative response.
Then OO.o makes more use of Java than LO does?
More questions:
Some say LO versions have problems recognizing some versions of Java.
Here, LO 3.3.04 runs with jre-6u19-windows-i586-s.
Should I expect trouble with LO 3.4.3 with this version of jre?
What about the jre version 7? (I think 7 is the current version.)
David Teague
I keep hearing that the newer version may be slower to do the work. As
for version 7, I have not used it. Linux version appear to use OpenJDK
instead of the normal Oracle JRE. They have it part of their
repositories, but you can find a Windows installer by Google-ing for one.
I have run my Vista laptop version of LO with version 6 update 23. I
was told that the JRE goes downhill with speed of use after that. Some
say update 21 might be the best one to use, for now. Some like OpenJDK
instead of the JRE, while some do not.
LO people are working on converting the codes that need Java to ones
that do not need it. Some extension will still require it though. To
be honest, would you want your software package to work based upon
someone else's software "package" to work? I.E., when they have issues,
then you would as well?
Now that OOo no longer is part of Oracle's product line, will Apache
continue to use the JRE as part of the package, or will they go LO's
route and replace the coding that require it. I believe LO is replacing
some of that code with Python based code instead of Java based.
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Do LO installers have Java Runtime? (continued)
Re: [libreoffice-users] Do LO installers have Java Runtime? · David B Teague sr
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Do LO installers have Java Runtime? · webmaster for Kracked Press Productions
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.