Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: SubForms and Photographs in LO Base

Hi :)
[pointedly ignores the medieval Trekkie reference]

The 3.4.1 will be much better.  Honest.  And it's due to be released quite 
soon.  The 3.4.0 has been widely condemned as having been released toooo 
hastily.  Oddly, most people have been enjoying using it without any problems 
but there are an unlucky few that have been forced back to the 3.3.3.  I stayed 
with the 3.3.2 more by luck than anything.

Regards from
Tom :)






________________________________
From: John B <johnb@email2.me>
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Thu, 30 June, 2011 18:55:12
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: SubForms and Photographs in LO Base

Its easy

The adopter with the triangle is in the vessel with the pestle and the 
stable which is able is the program that is true.

Please Please forgive me!

John B

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


On 30/06/2011 17:18, Steven Shelton wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 6/30/2011 12:04 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
>    
> > There is a yellow warning triangle and exclamation mark ! beside
> > the 3.4.x series/branch. Also it firmly says "For early adopters
> > only". The 3.3.x series/branch has a big friendly green tick and
> > words saying that it is the stable branch. It could be a little
> > bit clearer but i'm not sure how lol ;) Don't worry, lots of
> > people miss those details too.
> >      
> Well, yes, but "early adopters" doesn't imply "unfinished developer
> version". It merely implies "people who want the latest one first
> without subsequent bug fixes." The word "final" implies "production
> ready". I didn't install 3.4 because the warnings made me look at the
> release notes, which led me to believe there are known bugs that would
> cause serious problems for my office, but what if I hadn't gotten it
> from the website? What if someone had given it to me on a CD merely
> labeled "3.4 Final"?
>
> There needs to be some clearer information on the site, and if the
> even-numbered release are "development" branches, then there should be
> a warning for users when they install those versions, as well.
>
> - -- 
> Steven Shelton
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk4MoesACgkQXUonIzCvpdOVMQCfYaB3bB6iXlPgxVLJE1xEnE0h
> Z20AoIXzIvwZYUUSvsHeCy8BanwTUD2u
> =f6bZ
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>    
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.901 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3732 - Release Date: 06/28/11 
> 19:34:00
>
>    


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@global.libreoffice.org
In case of problems unsubscribing, write to postmaster@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@global.libreoffice.org
In case of problems unsubscribing, write to postmaster@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted