HI, Steve,
On 6/23/11 12:16 PM, Steve Edmonds wrote:
Hi ken
Doesn't the threaded view of emails in Thunderbird achieve the same as
subscribing to gmane. I have all incoming email related to LO filtered
into a folder and if it switches to threaded view it looks just the same
as the view in gmane, but without the need for another account.
steve
It does, but the devil is, IMO, in the details. :-) Some of the
details are in your personal preferences of how you want to access the
mailing list and for doing email.
I like to do email as HTML, embedding images, using Comic Sans font, and
the other bells and whistles available to you. But LO is text based
only, meaning no formatting other than line length, no images, no
proportional fonts, yada, yada, yada. LOL
If I used my email account to write a reply to an LO message, I need to
manually make sure of the line length, correct formatting of the replies
(the number of ">" characters at the beginning of the line, making sure
the text quoted is assigned to the correct poster, etc.), a monospaced
font, and who knows what else I'm not thinking of.
Perhaps LO takes care of this at their end, I don't actually know.
I've always had "irritations" with TB when replying to emails that have
been forwarded numerous times. Editing was a real PITA. I've installed
the latest version of TB just a couple hours ago, perhaps those
"irritations" have gone away. :-)
But if I use the Gmane newsgroup account, and subscribe to the LO users
list, then reply to the message, all of that correct formatting is
automatically taken care of for me. I don't have to worry about it,
which is one of the good things about computers and good programming.
Using Gmane, when a message comes in that has quotes from numerous
previous messages that are properly assigned to the writer, TB provides
a different shade of grey background for the text, making it easier to
see who posted what. If this isn't making any sense, send me an email
and I'll return a screenshot that shows what I am trying to say. :-)
I am not an expert at TB, still in the learning stage, so what I write
from here on may be in error, as I've not experimented with some of
this, it's just what I *think* happens based on the vocabulary used
within TB and my experiences so far.
Scenario:
Let's say you are a new subscriber to this users list. And you do have
some questions (that's why you came, right? :-) ), and maybe some of
your questions have already been asked and answered? How do you, using
just the mailing list, get the previous X (let's say 500 for discussion
purposes) messages, to scroll through and see if your question has been
asked?
LO does have a mailing list archive, and you can set it to threaded
view. But, those threads are not collapsible, so if there are 100
replies to the first post, you have to page through all those replies
before seeing the next subject. As as I write this, there are 74 pages,
@90 messages per page in my browser, to scroll through. With Gmane, the
threads can be collapsed in TB, giving you only one subject line to deal
with all 100 messages.
Those messages are in your browser, not on your hard drive for reference
later. It is more time consuming to use that to simply scroll through
the messages in TB, using either an email account or a newsgroup account.
This message of yours I'm replying to is already in the archive, I
suspect the addition of new messages happens in real time.
Using email in TB, I don't see a way to automatically download the
previous 500 messages automatically to your computer.
Using Gmane in TB, when you initially setup the account, you can can
tell TB how many message headers you want to TB to download. Tell it
500, and you get the previous 500 message headers. If there is a way to
ask for more old messages, I haven't found out how to do it, other than
to unsubscribe and the subscribe again and ask for more, or for all.
With email, message bodies are automatically downloaded, unless you tell
TB to *not* download messages over a selected size. Since you don't
want you lose those photos of XXXXX being sent by someone, a small sized
message from LO will always be downloaded.
With Gmane, and other newsgroups, you have to tell TB to download the
message bodies at the outset. Otherwise, the message body is downloaded
when you open the message. On my Mac, those message bodies are cached
on the hard drive, so presumably the message body is only downloaded
once, assuming the cached file is sound.
OTOH, with newsgroups and my understanding of the synchronization and
storage settings is correct, you can tell TB to download all the message
bodies to the computer.
For me, I see more advantages to having the mailing list displayed as if
it was a newsgroup server, rather than email. Not to mention, I
currently read 2 LO lists, and possibly may add another one or two in
the future. With the Gmane account, I don't have to create any filters
or deleted any filters as required.
At the moment, this is all I can think of. Hope I didn't bore you to
death! :-D
--
Ken
Mac OS X 10.6.7
Firefox 3.6.17
Thunderbird 3.1.11
LibreOffice 3.3.2
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@global.libreoffice.org
In case of problems unsubscribing, write to postmaster@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Mac people (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.