Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 21/04/2011 11:51, e-letter wrote:

A business that receives profits from customers that demand to use M$
software should simply pay the licences to meet their customers'
demands and consider it a cost of doing business.

I can't tell which of the following statements you mean:
* If a company is Microsoft only, it should pay all of the Microsoft
licenses for their vendors;
* If a company is Microsoft only, it should pay all of the Microsoft
licenses for their customers;
* If a company is Microsoft only, it should pay all of the Microsoft
licenses for their suppliers;
* If a company is FLOSS only, it should abolish that position, and use
Microsoft products;

Any business using open source software to generate a private profit should put their money where 
their mouth is;

a) Do you know how many employees the "average" business in the united
states has?
b) Do you have any idea how difficult it was for non-Sun clients to get
features and functions added to OOo?
c) Do you have any idea what the learning curve involved in knowing how
to code for OOo was/is?

Those three factors mitigated against organizations that were not in the
IT industry from even considering customizations of OOo, much less
paying for them.

Once two or three organizations offer Level 4 Support for LibO, you'll
see organizations that are willing to pay for the features that they
want/need/desire. That is also when you'll start seeing non-IT
organizations sending their customizations back upstream.

LO programmers should concentrate on making a good software product;
that should be the priority.

One of the major criteria that businesses use in selecting software, is
compatibility with their existing work-product. In terms of office
suites, that usually means the ability to read, write, and edit
documents in a Microsoft file format as well as, if not better than MSO
can read, write, and edit those documents.

Different organizations define the compatibility line differently.

Personally, I consider microsoft file formats to be "never twice same
output" formats, and hence best discarded.

jonathon
- -- 
If Bing copied Google, there wouldn't be anything new worth requesting.

If Bing did not copy Google, there wouldn't be anything relevant worth
requesting.

                              DaveJakeman 20110207 Groklaw
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNsK6rAAoJEERA7YuLpVrVkxwIAKIGnYYnnsxDY0cHOVJQVQ8i
Eiv75PNSjmzwdtdlO3z/kCxWmnXlmg4L6NmkrfjxD850w6tVYe5DhUPbz0agDqon
ZfARH/sGnMEylMwoMRiNDOPJkqcUifcV282rLYcXgPVFj7CtaguWY7a4DxYLpqXA
PG7/txWEfIEbLSmVC1UtO8TsO8j1oT1XchQnqJchXTq5vFS/fKzooVO0cH5mH0DR
9SDKb1ljyC/9//dWlQU8M5++2ttj3giEplYaLU5Y548IomgYs1ul1yMOYzyBg1tv
RMQSt9vkfN/SCSs5rM3cekvlYHP//9+9nVeL2o3zpYwfUuz/AEBXKzllK9H1E3s=
=hf4n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.