Aaaargh, sorry i don't know :((
Perhaps it can be asked as a general question at
http://www.linuxquestions.org
and / or in Fedora Forums at
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/
Sorry i didn't notice your email until just now!
Good luck and regards from
Tom :)
________________________________
From: Glenn <glenngg@tx.rr.com>
To: tomdavies04@yahoo.co.uk; users@libreoffice.org
Sent: Fri, 8 April, 2011 14:31:40
Subject: Re: off-list Re: [libreoffice-users] ERROR: Package
libobasis3.3-images-3.3.2-202.i586.rpm is not signed
That the whole problem how do I force RPM to accept the unsigned package?
Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
Does it allow you to accept it despite being unsigned? If so then accept it.
I'm not sure what the problem is but there have been other cases of having to
ignore secuity warnings although that was mostly about signing into bugzilla to
report bugs. LibreOffice is on a very aggressive release schedule and The
Document Foundation is not quite set-up as a fully official organisation yet so
a lot of stuff is going through Open Document Foundation or a registered
OpenOffice community group that still bears the name OpenOffice even though it
is mainly dealing with TDF's funding. Proper registrations are going through
but will take time. I don't think any of that has anything to do with the
problem you are facing except the rapid releases may have missed something.
Personnally i stick with the LibreOffice 3.3.1 as that is the latest stable
release that is already in the Ubuntu repos (well the LibreOffice ppa to be
pedantic). Other distros may have the stable 3.3.2 in their repos but i already
have more than enough functionality in 3.3.1. Can you find LibreOffice in
Fedora's repos? I would go with that rather than downloading off LibreOffice or
TDF's websites so that you get all the Fedora-specific tweaks. The one on TDF
or LibreOffice's website is likely to be ultra-new which is great if you like
beta-testing and being ahead of everyone.
Just my thoughts! Hopefully something there might help nudge but i suspect the
best answer is to just accept the unsigned package and post a bug-report so that
the devs know it needs fixing quick.
Good luck and regards from
Tom :)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Glenn <glenngg@tx.rr.com>
*To:* users@libreoffice.org
*Sent:* Fri, 8 April, 2011 13:27:06
*Subject:* [libreoffice-users] ERROR: Package
libobasis3.3-images-3.3.2-202.i586.rpm is not signed
Hello I am trying to install LibreOffice on Fedora 14. I have followed the
steps in the readme but received an error related to the signature of a
package. Can anyone advise on what I should do?
ERROR: Package libobasis3.3-images-3.3.2-202.i586.rpm is not signed
-- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org
<mailto:help@libreoffice.org>
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
-- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.