Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice without Java

Le 2010-10-27 05:49, Terry Phillips a écrit :
> On 26/10/10 23:40, Chris Jones wrote:
>  > Terry, are you 100% sure it doesn't install when Java is not present?
>  > OO.o used to install perfectly fine when Java was not installed. I see
>  > no reason why LO would not perform in the same manner.
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> I realise that LO and OO usually install OK when Java is not installed.
> However, an issue arose amongst those of us testing experimental builds
> of Wary Linux (a variation of Puppy Linux) using kernels 2.6.34.6 and
> 2.6.35.7. On first run OO and LO crashed at or before the splash screen
> if Java was not installed. Wary uses a layered file system and we use OO
> or LO as an sfs file. We have not previously had a problem but this may
> be caused by these particular Wary builds. However, I would be
> interested to hear if anyone else using a different distro has had a
> similar problem with these kernels.
>
> This has caused me to reflect on the desirability of a version of LO
> which is completely Java free. I think I read somewhere that Fedora has
> produced such a version. There are obvious political reasons for going
> down this road. ;) I wonder what are the future plans of LO developers.

Hi Terry:

Could you put a bug in for this? You will most likely get your answer to 
this from a dev. In fact, they will be interested in LibO's behaviour 
with your distro.

Marc


--
E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/users/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted