[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[libreoffice-projects] Minutes from the UX/design meeting 2019-Aug-22


Present: Heiko

Tickets

* Add option to show 'Apply Style' menu in plain text
+ https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62926
+ extra option or combination with existing
+ unclear what controls would be affected (Stuart, c9)
+ afraid of too many options if there are more controls (Heiko)
+ Tools > Options > View is across modules and "Show preview of styles" would be Writer-only (Heiko)
+ run a poll on the blog/ml (Cor)
+ https://design.blog.documentfoundation.org/2019/08/15/poll-about-design-preview-for-dropdown-controls/
* Add the new option under Options > View, next to "Show Font Preview" 40% (44 votes)
* Combine the two (and perhaps more) controls under the same option 29.09% (32 votes)
* Don't add another option 14.55% (16 votes)
* Add the new option under Options > Writer > View 11.82% (13 votes)
* Don't add another option and also remove the exiting "Show Font Preview" 4.54% (5 votes)
+ taking the 2nd and 3rd option together (combine and no new) the majority is against a new checkbox
=> combine the styles dropdown WYSIWYG preview with View > Font

* Safer application of options for each filter criterium in a pivot table
+ https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125864
+ having options for each of the 3 parameters is an overkill and impairing usability
=> WFM

+ Extend context menu in a pivot table with mark actions
+ https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125834
+ row/column selection is not limited to pivot tables
+ we have plenty of shortcuts to deal with data
=> WFM

* Support context menus for management of list entries in pivot table setup dialogue
+ https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125826
+ for accessibility it makes sense to have alternatives to the drag 'n drop actions
=> add context menu to field (Add to Row, Add to Column, Add to Values) and the
respective options at those lists "Remove"

* Support for multiple selection of list entries in data series selection
+ https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122007
+ multiselection in the chart wizard lists makes no sense
+ removing entries is only necessary if the selected range has not been chosen carefully
=> WFM

* Extended graphical user interface for the specification of several cell areas
+ https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122012
+ add +/- buttons to the text field for more graphical interactions (Thomas)
+ would be the fact for all cases with multselections not only charts
+ manual editing is common
+ it wouldn't be clear how +/- buttons work, in particular what is removed
=> WFM

* More explanatory title for "Compare documents" file select dialog
+ https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126618
+ rename the dialog title from "Compare to" to "Original document" (OP)
+ "Original" is not always correct (but most time)
+ have an explanatory static text (Thomas)
+ it's just a file dialog, adding text is a bad solution (Heiko)
+ help talks about "original"
=> let's change it


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: projects+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/projects/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.