Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last

A person who cannot decide if a string change is semantic or cosmetic to en-US should not be messing around with the string names in the first place, if you ask me.

Ok so maybe occasionally they might get it wrong. That still produces a lot LESS workload to fix that landing 2000 cosmetic en-US changes on 50 locales.

Not a good reason for opposing this approach.


Sgrìobh Jan Holesovsky na leanas 27/01/2015 aig 14:16:
Because the sources are the ultimate version of the strings.  Who would
be deciding if a change should be applied in the sources (ie. it is a
change needed for all languages) and what is just making the original
more consistent?  And again - what to do if the person mis-judges?

All the best,

*Akerbeltz <>*
Goireasan Gàidhlig air an lìon
Fòn: +44-141-946 4437
Facs: +44-141-945 2701

*Tha Gàidhlig aig a' choimpiutair agad, siuthad, feuch e!*
Iomadh rud eadar prògraman oifis, brabhsairean, predictive texting,
geamannan is mòran a bharrachd. Tadhail oirnn aig www.iGà <>

To unsubscribe e-mail to:
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.