Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last

Hi Cor,
On 10/04/2012 22:45, Cor Nouws wrote:

Bjoern Michaelsen wrote (06-04-12 19:55)

- CaseConductor evaluation
- Rainer: we need better documentation on the "why" of Litmus/MozTrap
- Kendy: Need for regular manual testing for update scenarios
- given the limited current reach of Litmus, we might propagate in blogs
- we really need to make structured manual a lot more visible for 3.6

I look forward to the outcome of the Litmus/MozTrap evaluation and
improvements in this area. It will help people run the tests more
easily. However, we must not forget that it's just that and not more.

If it's easy, it will attract people too. QA is frightening for a lot of users because it looks like technical when it's not. The tool should help that and currently Litmus is not fulfilling that.
Evaluation of the current situation showed some lack of available time
with people considered to work with it (and other QA topics). Thus if we
forget that, and only do improve the tooling... it might turn out to be
fooling our selves.
In that case we know that we can't extend people time, so let extend the number of contributors by providing an easy way to participate. Tools are only tools but this is what our contributors are playing with, see Pootle for example, it's the same here, it should be as easy as and as flexible as Pootle.
Kind regards
Sophie Gautier <>
Membership Committee Member - Co-founder
The Document Foundation

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.