[ANN] LibreOffice 3.4.2 RC1 available

Hi *,

for 3.4.2 rc1, we're now uploading builds to a public (but non-mirrored
- so don't spread news too widely!) place, as soon as they're available.
Grab them here:

http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/

If you've a bit of time, please give them a try & report *critical* bugs
not yet in bugzilla here, so we can incorporate them into the release
notes. Please note that it takes approximately 24 hours to populate the
mirrors, so that's about the time we have to collect feedback.

The list of fixed bugs in this release is here:

http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/src/bugfixes-libreoffice-3-4-release-3.4.2.1.log

So playing with the areas touched there also greatly appreciated - and
validation that those bugs are really fixed.

NB: I'm jumping in for colleagues on vacation, but don't follow all
developer/release lists closely. In case there are major stoppers,
please Cc me into your reply. Thanks!

Thanks a lot for your help,
Florian

Installed on Windows XP with luck.

Can open and save documents.

Cheers,
Leif Lodahl
The Danish Team

Den 14-07-2011 14:29, Florian Effenberger skrev:

for a clickable version, look at
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/User:Nnino/Drafts/bugfixes3.4.2

Nino

Hi,

I've been running smoketest module on the build on SLED 11 sp1 i586,
and tried to manually launch and did some random test.

All pass :slight_smile:

Best wishes,
Yifan

Hi all,

Nino Novak wrote (14-07-11 22:48)

The list of fixed bugs in this release is here:

http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/src/bugfixes-libreoffice-3-4-release-3.4.2.1.log

for a clickable version, look at
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/User:Nnino/Drafts/bugfixes3.4.2

Thanks for the lists,
I see that bug #37488 is not listed, though it is fixed.
This not being listed is caused by the fact that it is (IMO unfortunately) marked as WORKSFORME. See my latest comment in the issue:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37488#c67

Cheers

Hi Petr,

Petr Mladek wrote (19-07-11 17:22)

Cor Nouws píše v Út 19. 07. 2011 v 09:12 +0200:

Thanks for the lists,
I see that bug #37488 is not listed, though it is fixed.

The list of changes is generated from the git commit logs. The bug
#37488 started to work accidentally. There was no commit associated with
it.

OK, sorry for my wrong assumption - even more since I should have known better if I thought about the current :wink: process.

I am afraid that the list newer will be 100% because people sometimes
forget to mention bug numbers in commit messages. I guess that we do not
want to force bug number in every trivial commit. If it is not
mentioned, it is rather a detective work to find it :wink:

That's true. In any case I will keep it in mind so that I can add a bug number if I come across such a situation.

Kind regards,