Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last

Em 10-03-2011 14:50, Sophie Gautier escreveu:
We are still adpating Litmus to our needs, Rimas is doing that for us,
but if anybody has skills, I'm sure he will be happy to get some help.
So until Litmus is ready, we will use the wiki to run our tests on the
RC. The too the MoFo is developing to replace/enhance Litmus is not yet
ready (even not developed yet if I understand well). The MoFo will keep
us informed of the state of the development of this new QA tool.
But in the mean time we will use Litmus for the QA on dev/L10n/RC versions.


What is the direction to follow now? For pt-br, we are right to start
the QA.

Yes, doing QA is always right ;) So yes, please go on with your testing
on the next RC we will have. If you need help or have any question,
don't hesitate to ask here.

So, i think that i need other access profile in the Litmus, Sophie. I wish open the test cases for pt-BR too, like as in de/en/fr tests, and study more this tool.

I have some guys that will help me in this task. How can i manage this efforts in Litmus? Is more or less like the pootle, where we have a "admin profile"?


E-mail to for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.